Gastroparesis And Vulvodynia

matters most in the tactics or strategy? The question is very interesting and deserves attention. First try to understand what it means and what tactics, however, strategy. I found the website of Dr. Albanians http://www.albanesi.it/Scacchi/giocatore_scacchi.htm , an avid chess player, a clarifying response. The tactic

can be defined as the ability to find and calculate combinations. It is important at all levels, probably the most general and fundamental characteristic. In fact one of the most striking features of the beginner (kyu) is the lack tactics. He does not see the moves! It does not have good reading skills. The

strategy can be defined as the understanding of the position with the ability to develop meaningful plans for the conduct of the game.

In chess, the strategy for the beginner is certainly less important than tactics. If the player does not aspire to average levels (remember that the strength of a player with 1,600 points ELO player easily beats any coffee ...), the strategic understanding of the usual concepts (weak pawn, open column, block etc.). Is so vague and theoretical hardly be able to put it into practice without a solid tactical competence. In

kyu Go player tends to be more strategic and less tactical. This is because being tactical is much harder, you read well the moves, calculate, etc. ... Instead, the player is dan much more tactical.

Professional is both strategic and tactical know to get the most from a particular location.

I developed a mindset that should serve to grow faster:

1.Tattica (empathize, predict, anticipate, creation of solid forms, etc. ..)
2. Strategy (directions, use of force (given by the influence), concrete points etc ...)